🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have voted to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard females from abuse, including family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Thousands of protesters gathered in the capital this week to voice disagreement with the vote. The final authority now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the proposed law.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the 2011 agreement only took effect in the Baltic state last twelve months ago, requiring governments to establish legal frameworks and support services to eliminate all forms of abuse.

The Baltic nation has become the first European Union member to initiate the process of exiting from the treaty. The transcontinental nation withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Ideological Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was ratified by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its focus on gender equality weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a thirteen-hour discussion in the Saeima, MPs voted 56 to 32 to withdraw from the convention, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by politicians from one of the three coalition parties.

The outcome represents a defeat for centre-right Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this week. "We will not surrender, we will persist in our struggle so that violence will not prevail," she declared to the crowd.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the primary political groups advocating for the exit is Latvia First, whose head has called on the public to choose between what he terms a "natural family" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

Latvia's ombudswoman Karina Palkova urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group the rights organization asserted it was "not a danger to national principles, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and internationally.

22,000 people have endorsed a national appeal calling for the convention to be maintained. The gender equality group the rights center has called a protest for the coming week, charging lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

Global Worries and Possible Future Actions

The head of the Council of Europe's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a rash decision driven by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds majority, the president could possibly return the bill for further review if he holds objections.

Head of State the national leader stated on social media that he would evaluate the vote according to legal requirements, "considering governmental and judicial considerations, rather than ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a worrisome situation for women's rights not only in our nation but across Europe," stated a rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in multiple EU nations
• The Istanbul Convention requires particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• Latvia's vote could influence comparable debates in additional EU countries